Would you rather A. Buy land within reason and hunt it every year. Or B. Never buy land and travel to different public land thought out the 50 states.
I ask myself that question all the time....I also add in leasing property as an option. Still don't have an.answer though Sent from my H1611 using Tapatalk
If it was one or the other, I'd rather buy and be able to manage it the way I want. Hunting is but a handful of days, managing is year round.
Definitely owning land close to where I live. If I had the money, I would do it. It would be pretty cool to take friends and family out as well.
The best of both worlds. Own land that butts up to public access. It works out well. Sent from my iPhone using Bowhunting.com Forums
Travel to different public land on the 50 States for sure. All the different game and land would be fantastic! Sent from my iPhone using Bowhunting.com Forums
1) Own land to be a highly managed property for trophy deer 2) Sell hunts on highly managed property but reserve an area for my exclusive use 3) Use money from paying clients to hunt other states and species
Own land, good investment Ive got my eye in 147 acres right now, unfortunately i could only currently afford about 5 of those 147 Pesky real life responsibilities always getting in the way
B and lease land. Only land I'd buy is if it came with a summer home but even then maybe not. I love hunting different states and countries.
My preference would be A. You would not have the diversity but you would have the satisfaction of building something and using it. Also its something you could pass on.
Own the land---you enjoy it all year ! I visit land quite often I n off season to work on food plots and just get some peace and quiet and yes usually great investment, Lastly you can do what you want with your own land, and not woory about state feds o4r county regulations or other outdoorspeople want s and needs
