No. Though related, why my sister (a doctor) mentioned most doctors have moved away from PCR... Doc in the box and others still use them...
Justin : "Let's be fair here - this is a VERY top-level statement with zero clinical trials or real proof to back anything up. If you go on to read beyond the first paragraph the article quickly devolves into talking about "vaccine skeptic" Joe Rogan and other filler text. There is a single citation to the study that doesn't provide much in the way of clear data or results. While many would love to see a positive outcome of the many Ivermectin trails taking place, this is far from an "I told you so" moment." ********************************************************************************************* as for Ivermectin ... it works, esp. when used early with confirmed testing ... ... even in many late stage infections it works .....period !! .. I know I would trust Ivermectin loooong before I will ever trust the jabs ... The Global Disinformation Campaign to Suppress The Evidence of Efficacy of Ivermectin After a week of non-stop lectures, panels, speeches, and expert testimony, my new mission has now come into focus. https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/t...bstack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web As one of the world’s leading experts on the clinical use of ivermectin in COVID-19, I feel that it is my personal responsibility to try to create a historical record of the myriad actions taken against ivermectin by the global vaccine and pharmaceutical industry due to ivermectin’s long known and now proven role as the single greatest solution to the global pandemic. All subsequent “Disinformation Campaign Against Ivermectin” posts should be understood in this vein. My previous post of my recent testimony in Senator Ron Johnson historic expert panel hearing detailed the incredible efficacy reported by the numerous health ministries around the world that deployed ivermectin in early treatment programs. Note that I did not even bother to detail the 68 of 77 controlled trials involving 86,000 patients from 26 countries (many of them prospective, double blind, randomized controlled trials) that collectively report massive reductions in infections, hospitalizations and deaths, nor the dozen systematic reviews and meta-analyses (summary analyses of all the trials) that report the same. Nor did I present the analyses done after removing all the trials being attacked as low quality or “potentially fraudulent”.. which actually found the signals of benefit INCREASED. **** I am tired of presenting the efficacy data. The “debate” of the efficacy of ivermectin has long ceased to be a “data argument,” despite the attempts to make it one by claiming the world over that it’s efficacy is “unproven” due to the supposed fact that these many dozens of trials are all low quality, small, and/or fraudulent. For sure, such assertions have successfully injected such doubt that the near entirety of academic medicine in nearly all the world’s countries have accepted it as scientific truth. These asserions can and should only be understood as a massive global propaganda and censorship campaign against the efficacy data. That is why I believe the only way forward is to expose each and every one of “their” Disinformation tactics. If I am successful in doing this, it is my hope that this may begin to help end the decades long war of the pharmaceutical industry against repurposed, generic medicines. the rest at the link .. a great article for the doubters and vax nannies and for those who just want to be informed
Thanks DC politicians for this absolute craziness. The American people should reward them by voting them out.
so what they're saying is the virus is anti-Caucasian and disproportionally causes more severe illness amongst white people? ...buhbuhbuh that's not what Joy Reid says!
I have been in that environment and I promise that mosh pit kicked my arse way harder than Covid did.
Just got them back. Positive. Last night/this morning seem to be better. Fever and Headache finally subsided a bit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
These studies are a joke, glad to stop posting them as they changed before one hit submit and you look like a moron.
Interesting story on the at home tests, it is recommended that you use both of the tests in the kits. No matter the result use both. Are the tests that sketchy or is the general public unable to do the test properly?
The tests seem simple enough to do. The results seem sketchy to me. I have used both tests which came back negative. That is certainly not how I'm feeling.
Same for my wife, the cardiologist explain to us they are getting a ton of false negatives from the nose swabs, but when they swab the throat they get a positive.
