Another Liberal state with confirmed overly inflated death numbers. How many of these will we see over the course of the next 5 years as the affects of liberal lockdowns are realized further? Never let a Crisis go to waste, exploit it for all it's worth.... https://oaklandside.org/2021/06/04/alameda-countys-new-covid-death-toll-is-25-lower-than-thought/
Checked into the Hampton Inn in Thomasville GA. They are back to doing the full breakfast and newspapers in the lobby.
If you're over 70, it's not a hoax. If you're under 70 and don't have diabetes, it's a hoax (not the virus; the forced response.) All we had to do is isolate the at-risk. The rest of us could have gone on living our lives with very little collateral damage.
Will be interesting if we will ever get accurate death numbers from 2019, 2020, and 2021. Just total US deaths in those years to compare it to pre covid years.
I refuse to entertain his points when he loses a grasp of a concept, and tries to pivot direction and accuses of deflecting.
Like a 3rd string cornerback against every Lion QB not named Stafford, I just saw him lock onto his receiver at the snap and decided to jump the route. Pick 6, called back for Unsportsmanlike Conduct <taunting>
You know damn good and well even the noblest "free market" enties will throw out their integrity for a little extra profit.
Also, our healthcare system is not even close to a free market, and you know that. Lasik surgery is which is why the cost has come down 25%.
big trouble on the horizon in regards to vaxxing youngsters...multiple indications it causes myocarditis. Especially in those who already had the virus.
Dude your late on this one, had a great talk with my sons cardiologist about it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What's surprising about this? None of the vaccines are 100% effective at preventing you from contracting COVID. Vaccinated people are going to continue getting it - albeit at a much slower pace, and with less severe symptoms, and significantly reduced death rates. That's been the entire point all along. This is what I like to call "News for the sake of making news".
I have long held the opinion that young people don't need and may be harmed by the shots, but figured I'd give it until at least 6 months to start seeing enough data to get a picture on long term effects. It is now at that 6 month point. The spike in rates of myocarditis amongst 'vaccinated' young people is too big to ignore.
BTW, I liked your post because you are having good rational discussions with real health professionals rather than blindly following the talking head megalomaniac 'doctors' on TV who literally think they are The Science. I do not 'like' the fact that your young son needs a cardiologist. Sorry to hear.
