Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

What Do You Consider A BIG Buck?

Discussion in 'Bowhunting Talk' started by Lester, Jun 16, 2014.

?

What Do You Consider A BIG Buck?

  1. Under 120"

    9 vote(s)
    5.6%
  2. 120"-130"

    33 vote(s)
    20.6%
  3. 130"-140"

    30 vote(s)
    18.8%
  4. 140"-150"

    52 vote(s)
    32.5%
  5. 150"-160"

    33 vote(s)
    20.6%
  6. 160"-170"

    22 vote(s)
    13.8%
  7. 170"-180"

    11 vote(s)
    6.9%
  8. 180"-200"

    9 vote(s)
    5.6%
  9. Over 200"

    8 vote(s)
    5.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. tynimiller

    tynimiller Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Posts:
    13,160
    Likes Received:
    5,167
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    I figured 120-150 would be the wheel house...but yeah the 180 and up guys man.....envious I think?
     
  2. Skywalker

    Skywalker Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2010
    Posts:
    6,850
    Likes Received:
    806
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Missouri
    I think of 180+ as a giant!!!!!
     
  3. fletch920

    fletch920 Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Posts:
    9,314
    Likes Received:
    5,680
    Dislikes Received:
    46
    Location:
    iowa
    I am going to guess that the 4 people that voted over 200 inches as big, are high. I mean really? I am lucky enough to live in the land of the giants and can tell you that 200 inches is not just big, but it is absurdly big. I have seen exactly ONE on the hoof and have had my hands on 4 of them in over 30 years. I am guessing that if those same folks saw a 180's 10 point walk past their tree, they would consider it to be BIG. lol

    For the record, I voted 170 - 180 as BIG. I will kill deer smaller, and have killed deer bigger, but that is big to me.
     
  4. Siman/OH

    Siman/OH Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Posts:
    16,722
    Likes Received:
    1,975
    Dislikes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Ohio
    I've held three 200" from my county myself and still think 130" is a big buck. I've ran cameras for 11 seasons now and only have pictures of 1 confirmed 200" and 3 or 4 over 170" bucks. And that's with hundreds of different bucks on camera (10-15 different bucks a year). That's less than 3% over 170". 170" is a giant IMO.

    Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2014
  5. Scooter135

    Scooter135 Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    May 31, 2014
    Posts:
    285
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas
    Honestly I'm all for filling the freezer, but if one of the 4 8-10 pt bucks show up, I will for sure take it!!
     
  6. TwoBucks

    TwoBucks Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2014
    Posts:
    4,007
    Likes Received:
    284
    Dislikes Received:
    2
    Location:
    West Central MN
    I'd second that 170 is giant
     
  7. Lester

    Lester Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Posts:
    8,611
    Likes Received:
    3,311
    Dislikes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Buffalo Minnesota
    I wonder what the percentage of members here that have killed a 170" buck with any type of weapon? I am not talking net either just gross score. I bet it is VERY LOW.
     
  8. fletch920

    fletch920 Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Posts:
    9,314
    Likes Received:
    5,680
    Dislikes Received:
    46
    Location:
    iowa
    I guarantee that you are right. I would guess that if you took that a step further and counted the number of guys that have killed a buck over 180......you could count it on two hands. To me, that means a BIG buck is a lot smaller than 200 inches.
     
  9. Beagle001

    Beagle001 Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2009
    Posts:
    1,267
    Likes Received:
    7
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Central Wisconsin
    I am willing to bet that you can use your hands and toes and have them pretty well covered
     
  10. Slugger

    Slugger Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    Posts:
    8,756
    Likes Received:
    11,481
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Central MO
    Yea just looked at the same thing. Those guys must see 160's on many hunts throughout the year.
     
  11. Jacob1

    Jacob1 Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2013
    Posts:
    1,613
    Likes Received:
    17
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    West central Illinois
    If I saw a 180+ I would probably pee my pants and miss.
     
  12. Slugger

    Slugger Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2012
    Posts:
    8,756
    Likes Received:
    11,481
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Central MO
    haha dont know if I am hallucinating or not if I saw one near my hunting area!
     
  13. coheley665

    coheley665 Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2012
    Posts:
    2,252
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Michigan
    To me around my area 130-140 is a big buck, 150 + is a giant. Personally I am usually after a buck in that upper 120-140 range every year. But I will shoot a 110 buck all day long as long as he meets my 3 1/2 year old minimum
     
  14. ridgehunter70

    ridgehunter70 Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2014
    Posts:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Not to toot my own horn but this is what I consider a big buck. Its ky's biggest by bow that I know of. Scored 158 5/8" its a 8ptr my biggest to date. I have 6 others by bow. net[​IMG]

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk
     
  15. garyalarson

    garyalarson Newb

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Posts:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Classic! And ditto that.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  16. Schultzy

    Schultzy Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    9,692
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    150 incher. Though I've only saw a few here where I hunt in Minnesota. Seeing a 130 incher is a tough task here. Hard to get age on our bucks here.

    Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
     
  17. bowhunter42

    bowhunter42 BHOD Crew

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Posts:
    456
    Likes Received:
    20
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Fulton County Illinois
    150 or bigger in my neck of the woods. Different terrain and different states make a difference. The trophy is in the eye of the guy squeezing the trigger. I myself try to look at age and maturity before I look at the rack size. But if its a 150+ he's getting shot ;) in less he's like a 2 year old giant. Hard to come by those in free range fair chase.

    Tyler Rector BHOD prostaff
     
  18. northern rednek

    northern rednek Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Posts:
    188
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    I'd say 135 is a big buck. Got one last year and the deer here have huge bodies. Now I'm after a monster you guys ever measure neck size when you get em?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Fre
     
    Last edited: Jun 22, 2014
  19. CoveyMaster

    CoveyMaster Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Posts:
    9,888
    Likes Received:
    3,079
    Dislikes Received:
    18
    Location:
    MO/KS state line
    Meh...
     
  20. ridgehunter70

    ridgehunter70 Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2014
    Posts:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    what s that supposed to mean

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk
     

Share This Page