Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

The Great Debate: Speed vs. Kinetic Energy

Discussion in 'Bowhunting Talk' started by Bowhunting.com Staff, Aug 1, 2011.

  1. Bowhunting.com Staff

    Bowhunting.com Staff Administrator

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Posts:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    183
    Dislikes Received:
    0
  2. LittleChief

    LittleChief Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Posts:
    13,697
    Likes Received:
    52,092
    Dislikes Received:
    6
    Location:
    SE Missouri
    Well written and a good read, but I'll stick with my slower, heavier arrow with a lot of momentum to back up that kinetic energy.
     
  3. KodiakArcher

    KodiakArcher Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Posts:
    2,229
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    The problem is that this line of thought dodges the true problem. The true problem is not arrow speed or energy. The true problem here was user error. Become more proficient with your (not anyone specific, the general "your") gear and remember to adjust your sight, or learn how to estimate yardage better, or use your rangefinder if necessary and the point of arrow speed becomes mute. Don't use arrow speed like duct tape to get you by. Address the real problem at its root; proficiency.
     
  4. carbonrage

    carbonrage Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Posts:
    70
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    dugspur va.
    you are correct

    your absolutley right that a heavier arrow isn't necessary for whitetails.A good hit ona deer with a lighter arrow will still usually give you a passthrough.hitting the spot is what's critical.good hunting
     
  5. Vito

    Vito Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2008
    Posts:
    6,732
    Likes Received:
    6
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    West MI


    I'm not exactly sure what you mean by this, but I wouldn't call any shooting "wasting your time". A lot of good can come from real world shooting, such as improving form/mechanics. All practice is good.
     
  6. LittleChief

    LittleChief Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Posts:
    13,697
    Likes Received:
    52,092
    Dislikes Received:
    6
    Location:
    SE Missouri
    I totally agree with that, Vito. In fact I find it hard to believe that anyone could disagree with it.

    Just recently I heard someone else say that ALL practice should be done from the height you're going to be hunting from and in full hunting gear or you're wasting your time. :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2011
  7. NEW61375

    NEW61375 Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Posts:
    1,844
    Likes Received:
    161
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    VA
    The new arrows weighed 25 grains less? What's that =, about 4-7 fps. So lets say you started at 290 fps and now you are shooting 294-297 fps. Better start using a range finder or a multi pin sight because that aint buying you much in the "miscalculated yardage department".

    As far as ke you are talking a couple of pounds at best, either way non-issue. Unless you start making significant weight changes to your hunting set-up the gains and losses for speed and ke are barely measurable.

    This article is pretty informative.

    http://www.huntersfriend.com/carbon_arrows/hunting_arrows_selection_guide_chapter_5.htm

    KE calculator

    http://utopiaprogramming.com/ke/KineticEnergy.html
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2011
  8. KodiakArcher

    KodiakArcher Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Posts:
    2,229
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    I'll disagree with it to the point that practicing poor shot execution only trains poor shot execution. One of my favorite quotes; "Practice doesn't make perfect. Perfect practice makes perfect."
     

Share This Page