Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Thank you big government for bringing common sense into the game....NOT

Discussion in 'Food Plots & Habitat Improvement' started by CoveyMaster, Feb 14, 2015.

  1. CoveyMaster

    CoveyMaster Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Posts:
    9,888
    Likes Received:
    3,079
    Dislikes Received:
    18
    Location:
    MO/KS state line
    This is the most insane bunch of BS yet.....

    http://hardwoodfederation.wildapricot.org/Resources/Documents/One Pagers/Northern Long-Eared Bat.pdf

    Northern Long
    -
    Eared Bat
    Issue
    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) proposed listing the Northern Long Eared Bat
    (NLEB) as “endangered” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) on October 2, 2013. A final
    decision on an official listing was slated for October, 2014, but has been p
    ostponed for 6
    months by USFWS to April 2, 2015. The general consensus (including USFWS) is that the sole
    threat to these bats’ populations is a non
    -
    native fungal disease discovered in 2006 called White
    Nose Syndrome (WNS) for which there is no known cur
    e. What is known is that this disease is
    devastating to NLEB colonies once established, with morbidity rates exceeding 90 percent in
    many instances. While there is agreement that WNS is the root cause for the NLEB’s decline,
    there is disagreement over a
    pproaches to address the issue. Legitimate questions exist as to
    whether the USFWS is using the best science to evaluate the species and, as a number of
    comments on the proposed listing demonstrate; the best available science does not support
    listing the
    species as endangered.
    The NLEB’s range is enormous, encompassing the following 39 states (including D.C.): AL, AR,
    CT, DE, FL, GA, IL, IA, IN, KS, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NH, NJ, NY,
    NC, ND, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, VA, VT, WV,
    WI and WY.
    Background
    The USFWS has released interim guidance to protect the species from take, although the
    agency has identified WNS, not take potentially associated with habitat loss or other land use
    activities, as the threat to the continued existence of the species. As currently drafted, there
    could be a number of negative outcomes specific to the forest industry, including:
    *Click link to continue*

    http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/...d-About-Long-Eared-Bat-Listing-291282061.html
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2015

Share This Page