Sorry.........try again. My state alone sells about 250,000-300,000 small game licenses every year. You can't just make up imaginary answers and pass them off as fact. The rest of your ramble was based on a question no one asked (at least not me anyways) so not sure who that was for.
Well why the hell not...seems to work for you. I don't like your rules, lol. I think you need to put the bong down, you can't keep focus on the points even you bring up.
Honestly........no idea what you are trying to say. I think some people are getting confused as to who they are answering/asking. Slow down guys..........breathe and read.
I'm aware that it's possible to do so, but the cost to do so probably out weighs the result at that point. Many people don't feel like spending $15-20 on an arrow just to lose/break it shooting at a squirrel.
Pot calling the kettle black much? You've back stepped so much at this point you've gotten yourself confused. If you'd like, to make things easier for you...we can take this b*tch back to formula and start over so everything is straight in your mind. My stated opinion was that yes it should be allowed because those deer numbers need managed to help keep numbers down or controlled to prevent problems that come from overpopulated deer in highly human populated areas. Some things that are problems of over populated deer are disease, automotive accidents, destruction of personal and private property. Now tell us again why that's wrong based on your 30 years of "experience".
But that's not what you said at all....... So........it's not common sense that no rifles eliminates people's opportunity to small game hunt?? Which is it man
Again, I'm not sure where your confusion is stemming from as my statements have been clear and consistent from the start. If you would like to show me where I have done all this back stepping I would be interested to see it. Why did you put experience in quotes??
It makes sense to everyone but you, solve that issue... Because you literally have no experience with the matter at hand. lol
Your statements are contradictory and you think that makes sense?? It is clear you either don't put much thought into what you say or you have little to no logical reason for saying it. When this gets pointed out you either ignore it and just keep yapping or you back track and try to change what you originally said. I've pointed this out to you NUMEROUS times in both threads. It seems you are just talking to hear yourself make noise and have no substantive point to even make. I don't really know who you are and you sound (speak) like a young kid so not to be too harsh but you are seriously making yourself look like a fool. I have documented my first hand experience with numerous pictures, videos and discussions on this very site for over a decade. You really should know at least something about a topic before making such foolish remarks.
OK kid........I see now that you've only been a member here for a little over a year. That explains the disconnect. I didn't realize............I thought you were a long time member. Wow........the other guy has been here even less time. Not sure why but I thought he had been here before.
Despite being a new member, I can still conclude that you have zero experience to the matter at hand. Doesn't matter how many pictures you took of deer from your kitchen window. I look foolish, yet you're the one who's playing scientist, making ridiculous statements that show you know very little about the nature of deer in general. My member status doesn't blind others from that issue, either. You have yet to provide any type of example of your "experience", so let's see it!?
Ok kid..........tell me how you came to that conclusion and please elaborate on what ridiculous statements I have made that show I know very little about the nature of deer in general. Please be specific.
I have to agree, I got a chuckle out of reading this post. The rest of this thread is a pile of pissy crap but this was gold
