Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Scoring gurus: I have a semi-technical scoring question

Discussion in 'Bowhunting Talk' started by quiksilver, Feb 27, 2011.

  1. quiksilver

    quiksilver Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    979
    Likes Received:
    3
    Dislikes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    So here's the antler in question:

    [​IMG]




    [​IMG]



    And here's how I scored it:

    H1 - 1.5"
    H2 - 1.5"
    H3 - 1.5"
    H4 - 1.5"

    For the H-measurement, I measured 1.5" circumference at the midpoint between the pedicle and the tip, and repeated that same measurement for H-2, 3 & 4.

    G1 - 0
    G2 - 0
    G3 - 0
    G4 - 0
    G5 - 0
    Abnormal Points - 0
    Main Beam - 2.5"
    ___________________________


    TOTAL = 8.5" Gross B&C

    ___________________________


    Is this correct, or should I only be taking one H-measurement (resulting in a whopping gross score of 4")? Furthermore, did I take the H-measurement at the proper location?


    Would the methodology differ at all between P&Y and B&C?

    I want to make sure I give this monster shed every inch of credit that it deserves.




    Here's an official score sheet. Maybe it will help shed some light on the issue:

    [​IMG]

    Note that the tine length measurements include the words "if any," while the H-measurements merely specify the locations (i.e. Between the first and second points). If no such points exist, do you just repeat the H1 measurement 4 times over? Or do you just take the H-1 and stop there?
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2011
  2. headstrong

    headstrong Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Posts:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    74
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    southeast wisconsin
    you can only score a point once
     
  3. fatsbucknut

    fatsbucknut Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Posts:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pa
    how in the hell do you find sheds like that! you definitely have your eyes trained well
     
  4. Schultzy

    Schultzy Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    9,692
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    I believe that's correct quick.
     
  5. GregH

    GregH Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    20,775
    Likes Received:
    63,207
    Dislikes Received:
    30
    Is that gross or net?
     
  6. DriveTacks

    DriveTacks Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Posts:
    699
    Likes Received:
    14
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vermont
    heck dont bother with Net deductions we'll be calculating negatives!

    however i guess that's about as typical as a shed can get!
     
  7. quiksilver

    quiksilver Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    979
    Likes Received:
    3
    Dislikes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Headstrong - are you saying that I didn't score this shed properly by using 4 identical circumference measurements?

    Schultzy - I'm with you on this one (thinking that you are supposed to take 4 circumference measurements, even if the main beam has no tines).

    Anyone wanna chime in? I could probably be convinced either way, but for now, I'm sticking with Schultzy.
     
  8. headstrong

    headstrong Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2010
    Posts:
    1,164
    Likes Received:
    74
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    southeast wisconsin
    I believe since that would be the main beam. You could score the length and 1 circumference.
     
  9. fatsbucknut

    fatsbucknut Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Posts:
    1,410
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pa
    As far as i know you always have 4 mass measurements. I'm just not sure if you take the same 4 measurements or keep moving half the distance to the end of the beam for your 4.
     
  10. Dan

    Dan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Wisconsin

    I agree with Steve.
     
  11. DropTine249

    DropTine249 Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Posts:
    876
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Is that from a Chinese deer ? Hahahahaha.
     
  12. buckeye

    buckeye Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Posts:
    7,691
    Likes Received:
    909
    Dislikes Received:
    1
    Location:
    The OH-IO
    You are correct in how you scored the antler.
     
  13. quiksilver

    quiksilver Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    979
    Likes Received:
    3
    Dislikes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Thanks fellas. I after I posted the score, I started second-guessing my measurement techniques...

    Scott - I was waiting to hear from you on this one, because you've blogged about proper scoring methods, and I've learned a lot from reading your posts regarding the same.

    What about this:

    That seems quite reasonable, fats. Anybody have anything to add to this thought?
     
  14. Dan

    Dan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Wisconsin
    You use the same for all four measurements on a spike. Fork, H2, H3 and H4 are the same. Three point side, H3 and H4 are the same.
     
  15. quiksilver

    quiksilver Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    979
    Likes Received:
    3
    Dislikes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Thanks Dan.

    So, if this guy had a matching side, with a 3" spread, he'd gross approximately (8.5" x 2) + 3" = 20"

    Solid.
     
  16. DriveTacks

    DriveTacks Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Posts:
    699
    Likes Received:
    14
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vermont
    now that is some serious ground... growth???
     

Share This Page