I'm going to buy a Redfield Revenge 3-9x42 or 3-9x52 today. It'll be on my .22-250, in which i plan on doing some night hunting with. Is the 52mm worth $40 more, mainly for night hunting purposes?
I got a 40 Leupold on my Yote gun and have no problems night hunting, my research found that the bigger MM doesn't actually gather that much more light thats why I went with the 40. Having the scope mounted lower to the barrel was more of a concern for me. Also, you get what you pay for in a scope, lens quality is key, I just put a Vortex on my .300wsm and like this more then my Leupold, awesome quality with the best Warranty out there!
