Rob bucks ....here's a thought .....

Would you rather shoot a

1.) 120" symetrical rack buck

2.) 120" Rob buck ...let's say 80" on one side, 40" on the other? :p

 

Number 2 In a heart beat!! He'd go on the wall In a flash!!

 

I like the semetrical ones. Sorry Rob!!

 

I would go with number 1

 

would have to take no 1 -

 

I have a couple of #1's. Right now I would would go #2 "that sounded Bad you guy's know what I meant"

 

I'm with you, Schultzy .... give me a rack with character any day .... I like the non-typical over the typical .... although this year, I'll take either with my bow :D

 

Neither

BTW for a buck to have 80" and 40" he would score higher than 120" as you did not account for inside spread

 

I would take #2

I might not even shoot #1

 

I knew someone would jump on that ... ok Scott ... for the minimum deer you WOULD shoot, WHATEVER # that is ...... would you go Rob or typical? They say once you go Rob, it's tough goin back :D

 

It would take an absolute freak of a Rob buck for me to shoot another. I shot one back in 2003. One is enough for me

 

Jeff .... the question was which one would you RATHER shoot .... obviously you would take either, as would MOST guys .... but IF you had 2 bucks walking together, both would score 120 ..one a rob as stated in the original scenario ... both presenting a 20 yard broadside shot ...you get the pic ... now, which one?

EDIT**** Both are 3.5 year olds and neither is a piebald

 

Add about 20-30 more inches then yes.

 

LOL ....is this Jeff incognito? :D


I gotta put in the pet peeve thread, "People that don't answer the original; question on a thread" :D

 

Make them 130 and I'll take the typical, I don't care how worn his teeth are.

 

it answers it ... and on so many levels, I agree with your choices, as ANY 120" buck around my area would be a dandy ...

 

I'm kinda OCD so I'd go with numero uno.

 

I'd take number one

I shot a Rob buck last year:D

 

While I am sure it didn't score 120", been there done that in concept. I shot this deer in 2004. It didn't do anything for me one way or the other. At the time, I thought I needed to remove hime from the genetic pool. I now realize that was probably flawed reasoning on my part.


I would probally go with the typical. But hey, we all like different things.

 

I would shoot any buck with 80" of antler on one side, as long as its a "good representation of the species" :D