Maybe not directly, but in ways, sure she did. Its all in how you use what you got. I think she has a good heart
The forum fool speaks out yet again. You're as ignorant as you are bald, and if you are not truly bald yet, that just means you are yet to become that much more ignorant. Shame me with your wealth, and lay on a little hypocrisy while you're at it. You're an effing fool and prove it with most of your posts.
She was a wonderful heart I can't imagine being her and what she has endured these last 4 years. I just wondered how Garret viewed a woman who was an immigrant, married a rich American 25 years older. He stated his view and I respect it.
A model who met and married a rich guy. I think that’s very different than Camela. I was simply stating how she had an affair which boosted her political career when she was just starting out. Good for any women who is successful, I just think that she’s a phony and I don’t like her. Sent from my iPhone using Bowhunting.com Forums
Little testy this morning. Don't let election results influence your emotions it just isn't with it. We are all sick of the BS in Gov't both sides suck and do not really have our best interests in mind, they are there to line their pockets. Name me the last politician that donated their salary? Oh wait, without a google search I can name just 1.
Yup. At the end of the day, both sides are just different wings connected to the same plane. Sent from my iPhone using Bowhunting.com Forums
Can I ask a stupid question? I haven't followed along with any of the details of everything that's going on. Why are the republicans accepting the results of congressional and senate races but are refuting the results of the presidential race? Weren't they on the same ballots? Not sure if I'm just dumb or misinformed (probably both). Not going to sit in here and argue about it for pages, just looking for someones views on it.
Rhetoric. Though I did hear 1 race (i forgot if it was a local or congressional race, not in my districts) that was revised due to recount. The due process, does often allow for recounts, though it varies by state (usually like within 1/2 or 1 percent). But any fraud claims really require substantiation. This gets really tricky with circumstantial info, as some states allow things like ballot harvesting, others not...rumors of late ballots included, but some states passed laws that allowed for different circumstances, postal guy driving into Canada...not allowing observers really doesn't constitute fraud, but there may or may not be concerns there. Who knows what else...but the onus is on the GOP/pres to make the case, courts decide. I think the couple seats not decided, go to run offs, though there are some counts/recounts out there... They just don't make headlines.
Iowa had a hotly contested US House Rep race that was announced for the Republican candidate by a decent margin. Once all the Presidential BS came to light and things started dragging on, it was announced that there was a problem with the House race. A liberal stronghold in the Iowa district for this race announced that a number had been transposed when reporting votes. Believe it or not, this "mistake" was corrected and all of the sudden, the Democratic candidate had just enough votes to oust the Repulican "winner". I have zero confidence in the system at this point.
Not sure if it's true but I read somewhere that they found a lot of ballots that were solely marked for Biden, making them suspect. Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk
