I totally understand doubt and a healthy dose of cynicism. However many of the arguments made are more emotional than logical, and leave out variables that present a more realistic picture of the application and use.
I believe in using ozone 100% In a stand I believe it is peeing in the ocean. I would rather take the $400 an apply it to the next mount than having a fan in my stand.
Your not trying to pollute the entire ocean, it isn't needed. All you need to do piss in your upwind scent steam. So that's a overly dramatic analogy that isn't a good illustration of what a person is trying to accomplish with the unit. Again with the 400, there maybe be maybe many things you rather spend the money on, however that's irrelevant to effectiveness of the unit.
You have used a unit in the field, did you abandon other scent control measures that you did in the past once you saw the effectiveness of the unit? How clean did you try to hunt in the past?
I hunted and still do hunt very clean. The only way for a fair comparison would be to use my already established baseline and compare results. So in short my opinion is based on hunting the same way with and with out the unit. I have since become more liberal in my stand selection while using the unit.
Exactly. The quotes about being bad for your health I agree with but I will say it again...IF YOU CAN SMELL IT YOU ARE USING IT WRONG. The simple directions come with the unit and are extremely easy to read and understand.
