I am putting this in the cooler because I suppose it is debatable. My thought is does anyone see a difference between ethics and laws. I would have to say I do. Because I feel there issome grey area. Point being I don't feel I am a bad driver if I drive 27 in a 25 mph zone. So in theory should I feel unethical if I were to bait with 2.5 gallons in a two gallon zone. Now I am not saying I do either, but I have talked to people who say if you break any hunting law in any way it is not ethical
I pretty much agree with this statement. When it comes to ethics in the medical or legal fields, I think that the difference in what is ethical and what is legal are very close to being the same. If you're talking about hunting, then what is "considered" ethical and what is legal are as different as night and day. Hunting ethics, in my opinion, are almost always personal. They are based on your personal beliefs and your personal abilities. When it comes to hunting there is a clearly defined line between what is legal and what is illegal. A 60 yard bow shot on a deer is not illegal, but if you make a post saying you took that shot you will most likely be flame-sprayed by multiple people on here even if you make a good shot and kill the deer. If you missed, then it will be even worse. If, however, you make a less than stellar hit, wound the deer and don't recover it you will most likely be crucified via internet.
I think this post makes it pretty clear that, at least when it comes to hunting, something may be legal, but not ethical. Yup, very clear
Laws are things we are expected to follow, by law, to have a functioning society. Ethics are things we try to force others to follow because we believe they are right.
I think it would be much more accurate to say that when it comes to hunting something may be legal, but it may be perceived by many to be unethical.
