Earlier this month I posted a video of a Female News reporter being bit during an interview of the dog after being rescued. In this follow up I post no blame and believe that the 2 separate but equal video can be analyzed as a learning experience for all. Both video are very similar that is worth noting and both injured parties was possibly instructed to pet the dog in the same manner to keep them calm and assure them they meant no harm. It was their leaning into the dogs facial area that caused the animals reaction. [video]http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cts=1330621472056&ved=0CDUQtwIwAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebaumsworld.com%2Fvideo%2Fwat ch%2F82322500%2F&ei=HaxPT6vDCafr0gGwiYnCDQ&usg=AFQjCNGnQubXDbqOMKQc95J78q8Rm-rOGQ[/video]
or the counter theory that reporters taste better than eveyone else. Once again, we have a dilema. Fitz, let's get a 10 million dollar grant from the feds to test this and find out!
Good idea IV! Let's see, here's a quick list of items we'll need to incorporate into the Grant proposal. For unobtrusive, scientific observations: 4-6 Lone Wolf stands & Sticks reconyx Trail cams (12 ea.) video gear from Campbell Outdoors Sitka clothing 2 Badboy buggies for transporting gear in a quiet fashion a couple sets of Leupold or Swarovski Binos a handful 200-400 acre parcels of land throughout the country to provide environmental variances in our study .... .... .... The list goes on
