The same can be said for the Obama supporters they just loved everything he did and he could do no wrong. The media even kissed his butt more than they did Bill. With that said anybody that supports everything a leader does has a problem.
The disenfranchised got organized and elected someone beyond the party of blind followers. Big difference, and still not an ideology that can be easily grasped by the liberal minds.
Let's be serious. If he was your first choice out of the GOP, stop reading because I'm going to use words with more than one syllable. I am an outdoorsman first and foremost and I value the environment. If you hunt and don't respect the need for national public land with protections from toxins, then I'm not sure how you expect to pass the sport to your children or grandchildren. I am not impressed with this administration's disregard for protections that are already in place. We are a long way removed from the Teddy Roosevelt days where people could see past the next day of stupid tweets and actually focus on protecting our true values and resources. We had legitimate choices (Kasich or Rubio) but we chose Trump. Do you think we have an education crisis in this country? (That's rhetorical)
Headline from CNN Then when you get into the article you can actually read this. And people wonder why Trump calls it fake news. Wouldn't a more accurate title for the article be how he was instructed not to list the information clearing him of wrong doing?
This is the type of stuff that makes me question trump a lot. http://www.jsonline.com/story/news/world/2017/05/25/manchester-bombing/102136504/
Who is responsible for the entire outfit? This **** wasn't happening before. It applies to trump as we seem to be pissing off our strong allies on a daily basis.
Are you saying information hasn't been leaked to the media before Trump? You can't be serious? Hell there isn't even anything that shows the leaks came from the US only that the US media reported them. Like the USA Today doesn't have contacts in London. There is absolutely NO way this can logically be blamed on TRUMP.
The sheer volume and flow is crazy. I'm not a NYT guy but he makes some valid points on where there is smoke there is fire. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/opinion/trump-leak-tattlers.html?rref=collection/column/frank-bruni&action=click&contentCollection=opinion®ion=stream&module=stream_unit&version=latest&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=collection&_r=0 It is just another example and something to keep all of our eyes on. This is becoming a pattern. I don't trust the guy.
I couldn't resist finishing this post despite all of its big words. Your angst and anger warms my heart more than pictures of puppies and kittens. *smiling vividly* Have a great day, sir.
I must and whole heartedly disagree with that article and the idea that the leaking is Trumps Fault Does this guy and you for apparently agreeing believe that all the people leaking information where appointed by Trump? If anything all the leaking is coming from people who got where they are while Obama was in office. If anything is shows the character of the previous administration. If it hasn't started, I wouldn't give it long before Trump and his "team" start flowing specific information into individual departments to flush out where the leaking is coming from.
It certainly looks from my perspective that his appointees are doing at least some if not most of the leaks. Either way this is a dangerous path we are going down right now.
What evidence and what leaks came from a Trump Appointee? All I see is more evidence that Trump needs to open up the drain on the swamp more.
Well since it is a leak it is hard to have any evidence. However, when conservative minded outlets agree its Trumps appointees then its hard for me to say its media bias.
- Carrier, the company Trump pledged to keep on American soil, just informed the state of Indiana that it will soon begin cutting 632 workers from its Indianapolis factory. “The manufacturing jobs will move to Monterrey, Mexico, where the minimum wage is $3.90,” Daniel Paquette reports. Trump told Indiana residents at a rally last year that, if he got elected, there was a “100 percent chance” he would save these jobs at the heating and air-conditioning manufacturer. "It’s not like we have an 80 percent chance of keeping them or a 95 percent chance,” he said. “100 percent!!”
Gotta love this President. Donald Trump tells Nato allies to pay up at Brussels talks http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-40037776 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry I can't grasp Trumps, ideology, you're correct 1. Tells companies it's horrible to manufacture products in other countries and sell it America, while doing so himself. 2. Buys Miss Ameria so he can look at naked woman, his words, not mine 3. Supports abortion/ against abortion, I guess it matters who's voting for him 4. Unprofessional/rude and an embarrassment to our country 5. Promised health care for all, not going to happen, again his words not mine I don't understand why folks support him, especially "Christians", because there is no way Jesus walks with this clown.
