Apparently you don't "got it". It is related in that a list of honors and awards don't necessarily convey honesty or competency. I thought you would be sharp enough to get that. I was wrong.
Apparently you are under the misguided notion that citations and awards automatically convey honesty and competence with no ulterior motive.
Likewise at no time does a long list of accomplishments and citations assume a lack of honesty or competency. Its only a failed assumption on your part that again, I suggest was done for theatrics alone as a replacement for substance.
Nope! it never entered my mind until you started lamenting. Now you make sure to let us know when you have a valid point.
LOL And your list was for, what? To bolster your point that he is all that is right and good concerning white tail deer? Sorry, I guess I am not nearly as impressed as you think I should be.
To establish that he is qualified to do the task assigned and his long history in whitetailed deer studies and management makes him a good candidate for the job he was hired to do. Its the accepted convention and metrics by which such a selection should be made. I’m sort of surprised that I need to explain this to you. I think its an indictment of the public education system that released you too soon and ill prepared.
That was lame and poorly constructed the first time so posting it again just exposes your limited horizons and inability to properly conduct yourself in the arena of ideas. Loosely translated, what you posted is akin to “nana nana boo boo” or “I know you are but what am I?” of “You’re not the boos of me”. I’m left to assume that your contributions here and the end of the school year are not a coincidence?? :D I’m actually looking forward to the next linguistic “gem” you will wow us with. Should I expect "Tag, your it!"
Outstanding! Is there a short book out there that you draw from for these gems? Both my sons are adults so its been a while since I've heard such talk. I'll try to communicate at your level. you are....................... Ahem.................... You big................ You are a poopy head. Perhaps there will be a grown-up that will come along and actually be on topic.
Ok I am here, Kroll rocks, D&DH sucks, unions blow, GOP rocks. Crabtree is very wise. The world would be a better place if he ran things. Could it be Crabtree 2012?
The thought of waiting years for bruce to mature to the point where he will be able to offer substance on this topic is not something I look forward so do your best to keep up. Its clear that the ties that Schmidt and D&DH have to the old DNR and SAK and McCaffery and what appears to be an anti Walker bias tells me that no matter what recommendation the 3 PhD’s come up, we can expect Schmidt and D&DH to throw a fit. SAK is dead in WI. Ever since EAB and mandated antler harvest drastically changed how hunters hunt and the state pushed for male harvest that was not at opportunity rate but rather at mandated rate, SAK became less reliable. QDM and hunter attitudes are also to blame. I don’t think anybody will be surprised at Kroll’s recommendations when they are made public. Ending SAK will go a long way to improve the situation.
Gary Alt is outstanding. Kroll, not so much. How much influence Alt has will determine the success of the recommendations. Alt said SAK isn't the problem. It's not a scientific problem, he said, it's a sociological problem and a political problem. He told those attending one of the public forums that for all the problems you have or think you have, this (Wisconsin) is paradise. Tops in trophy deer? Check. Tops in harvest over the past decade? Check. He gets it.
