I think a happy medium is 20 teams at 6 per team. You are not watering the champions team too much and there is still a good number of teams. The 10 people per team seems a little high to me.
I prefer fewer teams, to fewer team members. Whatever number gives 10-15 teams is my opinion. Keeping track of too many teams is tough. And to stir the pot, I say the champs get tossed back into the shuffle since the team size is changing.
Teams of 6-8 sound good to me. 10 man teams seem too high, although it seems on this site that we all have known each other (at least have seen each other's names for years) for years, so the potential for people to just vanish (like on HNI) and not contirbute is minimal.
I think 10 gives each team a sporting chance, just in case they get someone who has a bad season, doesn't get to hunt much or something, at least there are 9 teammates to pick up the slack a little.
Dustin that's one dam nice >>>BAM<<< your flinging around there :D I like the idea of around 8 per team.
Yeah this is the way to go because, with all of the people it might just get hard to keep track. But I think the champs should still remain the same.
Doesn't really matter to me how many are on each team , I would like to see more involvement from all members of the team. I've seen some members would check in and thats all you would hear from them ( diffrent site ) .
