Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Buck harvest stats

Discussion in 'Bowhunting Talk' started by Schultzy, Feb 5, 2010.

  1. Schultzy

    Schultzy Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    9,692
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Here's some Info I thought was very Interesting.

    These #'s tell the % of bucks In each of 3 age classes harvested In each state. Some states do not track data like this. Some only track the % of yearling (1-1/2 year old) bucks. If the numbers don't add up to 100%, that's usually because the state lumps all deer 3yrs and up Into one category. All numbers are from the 2008 season. Anterless data here as well.

    Midwest

    Iowa
    No data on bucks
    Anterless- 64%

    Illinois
    1.5- 41%
    2.5- No data
    3.5- No data
    Anterless- 62%

    Indiana
    1.5- 40%
    2.5- 40%
    3.5- 20%
    Anterless- 61%

    Kansas
    1.5- 17%
    2.5- 34%
    3.5- 49%
    Anterless- 48%

    Kentucky
    1.5- 41%
    2.5- 38%
    3.5- 21%
    Anterless- 54%

    Michigan
    1.5- 61%
    2.5- 25%
    3.5- 14%
    Anterless- 49%

    Minnesota
    1.5- 67%
    2.5- 20%
    3.5- 10%
    Anterless- 57%

    Missouri
    1.5- 22% (58)**%
    2.5- 54% (31)**%
    3.5- 24% (11)**%
    Anterless- 65%

    North Dakota
    No buck data
    Anterless- 63%

    Nebraska

    1.5- 34%
    2.5- No data
    3.5- No data
    Anterless- 47%

    Ohio
    1.5- 50%
    2.5- 32%
    3.5- 18%
    Anterless- 64%

    South Dakota
    No buck data
    Anterless- 48%

    Wisconsin
    1.5- 53%
    2.5- No data
    3.5- No data
    Anterless- 69%


    Northeast

    Connecticut
    1.5- 40%
    2.5- No data
    3.5- No data
    Anterless- 54%

    Delaware
    1.5- 53%
    2.5- 29%
    3.5- 19%
    Anterless- 73%

    Massachusetts
    1.5- 39%
    2.5- 24%
    3.5- 19%
    Anterless- 50%

    Maryland
    1.5- 62%
    2.5- No data
    3.5- No data
    Anterless- 65%

    Maine
    1.5- 37%
    2.5- 23%
    3.5- 15%
    Anterless- 36%

    New Hampshire
    1.5- 45%
    2.5- 26%
    3.5- 29%
    Anterless- 41%

    New Jersey
    1.5- 64%
    2.5- No data
    3.5- No data
    Anterless- 65%

    New York
    1.5- 62%
    2.5- 26%
    3.5- 12%
    Anterless- 53%

    Pennsylvania
    1.5- 52%
    2.5- 35%
    3.5- 13%
    Anterless- 64%

    Rhode Island
    1.5- 38%
    2.5- 27%
    3.5- 35%
    Anterless- 53%

    Virginia
    1.5- 37%
    2.5- 37%
    3.5- 26%
    Anterless- 56%

    Vermont
    1.5- 15%
    2.5- 59%
    3.5- 26%
    Anterless- 44%

    West Virginia
    No buck data
    Anterless- 47%


    Southeast

    Alabama
    1.5- 25%
    2.5- 35%
    3.5- 40%
    Anterless- No data

    Arkansas
    1.5- 13%
    2.5- 38%
    3.5- 49%
    Anterless- 45%

    Florida
    No data

    Georgia
    1.5- 45%
    2.5- 32%
    3.5- 23%
    Anterless- 60%

    Louisiana
    1.5- 22%
    2.5- 20%
    3.5- 50%
    Anterless- 45%

    Mississippi
    1.5- 17***%
    2.5- 21***%
    3.5- 58***%
    Anterless- 53%

    North Carolina
    1.5- 39***%
    2.5- 39***%
    3.5- 22***%
    Anterless- 52%

    Oklahoma
    1.5- 27%
    2.5- 32%
    3.5- 26%
    Anterless- 44%

    South Carolina
    1.5- 59%
    2.5- 23%
    3.5- 18%
    Anterless- 52%

    Tennessee
    1.5- 44%
    2.5- 40%
    3.5- 16%
    Anterless- 32%

    Texas
    1.5- 27%
    2.5- 19%
    3.5- 54%
    Anterless- 45%


    West


    Arizona
    No data

    California
    No data

    Colorado
    No data

    Idaho
    1.5- No data
    2.5- No data
    3.5- 25%
    Anterless- 31%

    Montana
    No data

    New Mexico
    No data

    Nevada
    No data

    Oregon
    No buck data
    Anterless- 7%

    Utah
    No data

    Washington
    No data

    Wyoming
    No buck data
    Anterless- 44%

    ** data from antler-point-restriction counties (non-antler-point-restriction counties)
    *** data from check stations and DMAP
     
  2. jmbuckhunter

    jmbuckhunter Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Posts:
    4,114
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    I'd like to know how Missouri could break it down like that since they don't have check stations and 90% of hunters couldn't tell you how old their buck was?? :rolleyes:
     
  3. HuntingBry

    HuntingBry Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    1,542
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SE PA
    Interesting data, and as JM pointed out, I'd like to know how they collected it and how accurate it is. KS is at 49% 3.5+?!?!:eek: They've got some old bucks running around down there.
     
  4. rednas5

    rednas5 Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2009
    Posts:
    1,472
    Likes Received:
    452
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Northwest Missouri
    I also was wondering this while reading it on QDMA. I was told that "surveyors" were sent to processing plants which helped with some of their data. Either way I was please to hear that Missouri is one of only two states, in any region, to place in the top five for every category and came in 2nd to Kansas in the Midwest for QDM principles. Those categories were broke down into four categories:
    1) percentage of a state’s WMUs at the desired deer goals
    2) percentage of 2008 antlered buck harvest that was 1.5 years old
    3) percentage of 2008 antlered buck harvest that was 3.5 years or older
    4) percentage of 2008 total harvest that was antlerless deer
     
  5. SparrowHawk

    SparrowHawk Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Posts:
    1,218
    Likes Received:
    181
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SW Michigan
    Great Info, thanks! I figured Michigan 1.5yr olds killed would be high.
     
  6. mudnation 1

    mudnation 1 Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2009
    Posts:
    635
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    southwestcity missouri
    Very interesting, thanks for the info. Great post.
     
  7. DoePeeSteve

    DoePeeSteve Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Posts:
    590
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Virginia
    Kick me in the crotch right now. PA is the 3rd LOWEST in 3.5+ kills percentage wise. What the heck to we need, a 16 point restriction to let these poor creatures mature?:(

    Great info otherwise. Thanks for the post. What an eye opener.
     
  8. rybo

    rybo Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Posts:
    4,459
    Likes Received:
    3
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    That's pretty neat info(assuming its accurate)

    I could only imagine PA's numbers before AR. I heard estimates that we had a better than 80% harvest on 15 yr olds.
     
  9. virginiashadow

    virginiashadow Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    Posts:
    28,962
    Likes Received:
    55,879
    Dislikes Received:
    39
    If one really believes that Virginia's 3.5+ year old buck harvest sits at 26% of the total buck kill, then I have some ocean front property to sell you in Iowa.
     
  10. GMMAT

    GMMAT Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Posts:
    4,981
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mostly in a treestand
    NC "Antlerless" is at 52%.....lol

    What a cop out. What does this mean (as far as buck/doe harvest data)?

    And yeah....who's verifying the ages when people call their kills in? Nobody even asks!
     
  11. GregH

    GregH Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    20,775
    Likes Received:
    63,207
    Dislikes Received:
    30
    Louisiana Rules!

    Do you you suppose that this data is at least as accurate as Wisconsins deer population data??
     
  12. virginiashadow

    virginiashadow Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    Posts:
    28,962
    Likes Received:
    55,879
    Dislikes Received:
    39
    Here is the call I placed in 2008 to the phone call check in system here in Virginia.

    Computer voice..."enter total antler points for buck"

    Me..."6"

    Computer Voice..."thank you, good bye"

    How the DNR can then extrapolate that I killed a 1.5 year old, 2.5 year old, 3.5 year old or whatever based on that information is beyond me.
     
  13. buckeye

    buckeye Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Posts:
    7,691
    Likes Received:
    908
    Dislikes Received:
    1
    Location:
    The OH-IO
    I see some guys do not agree with their states published numbers. I would think Ohio's numbers are fairly accurate.
     
  14. Arkansas Bowhunter

    Arkansas Bowhunter Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2009
    Posts:
    275
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Antoine river Bottoms, Clark County, Arkansas

    Same thing with Arkansas. 49% for 3.5's that seems high too me.
     
  15. MeanV2

    MeanV2 Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    954
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    IL.
    I know from working closely with IL check stations in the past that I wouldn't stake much on any info they published. Least of the age of Bucks taken.

    Dan
     

Share This Page