Best Arrow and Broadhead for my Bow

Discussion in 'Tech Talk' started by Kennethp7, May 24, 2010.

  1. Kennethp7

    Kennethp7 Newb

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Posts:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    I am new to bow hunting and recently bought a new Maxxis 35. my draw weight is 55lbs and draw length is 28in. I want to shoot the fastest arrow i can, but without compromising on the penetration. i am currently shooting 393 grain arrows, but am considering going down to 367 grains. Also, i have heard that cut on contact broadheads are better for lower poundage bows. What weight arrow and broadhead would you recommend for taking down whitetails with this setup. i also have peep sight, kisser button and whisker biscuit which will also slow it down some.
     
  2. davydtune

    davydtune Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Posts:
    267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Albion PA
    I know some will disagree but I wouldn't go any lower in arrow weight than what you have right now. In fact I'd go a bit heavier but what you have will certainly work. As far as heads go most anything on the market will work well for you as long as they hit their mark. I'd say look at WacEms, G5 Strykers, Magnus Stinger 4-blade, Thunderhead XP, Wasp Boss or Sharpshooters, Slick Tricks, Muzzy, or Tight Point. All superb heads and great penetrators.
     
  3. Backcountry

    Backcountry Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Posts:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bitteroot Valley
    Im an agreeance(sp?) with davydtune here. I favor a heavier arrow. It's quieter and penetrates better. Your 393 would be perfect. Look at all of the broadheads and decided what looks good and functioning to you. Just about any head will be fine for deer as long as it's placed right
     
  4. OHbowhntr

    OHbowhntr Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Posts:
    2,443
    Likes Received:
    21
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SE Ohio
    Agreement??? :confused:

    Ken,
    What are you looking to achieve....???

    I shoot some really good arrows that you can get at a true bargain, and would be a very good spine match for you. Realistically, anything in a .400 spine w/ a 125 tip should work well for you. The arrows I shoot in a 55/70 would run about 400gr. in a 27.5" shaft w/ a 125gr tip and 3 blazers.

    That's gonna put you somewhere in the mid-250's speed wise, which is PLENTY to kill a deer.
     
  5. BJE80

    BJE80 Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Posts:
    14,267
    Likes Received:
    277
    Dislikes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Central and Northern Wisconsin
    You will be better off slow and heavy than light and fast in most situations. Especially in the penetration side of things. Don't fall into the obsession with speed. Make sure you get your bow in tune and you will be better off.

    Good luck
     
  6. greeneyedeagle

    greeneyedeagle Newb

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2010
    Posts:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Concord, NC
    I think the above are all good points but I look at one other
    thing also. Kinetic energy of the arrow. When you look at
    the formula you only get to use one half of the mass/weight
    but the velocity/speed is squared. So the velocity makes a
    larger impact on kinetic energy than does weight. I believe
    you can over weight an arrow thinking it will make a huge
    difference but it doesn't to some point. There must be a
    balance but for me I will go for a lighter arrow with more
    fps over a heavy arrow with lower fps. Something to think
    about or maybe not.
     
  7. Backcountry

    Backcountry Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Posts:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bitteroot Valley
    This goes both ways, sometimes Kinetic energy doesn't mean squat. His arrow at 393 will out penetrate an arrow at 367 every day of the week. For a low poundage, low speed outfit, its weight over speed.
     
  8. davydtune

    davydtune Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Posts:
    267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Albion PA
    Definitely. When talking lower poundage, short draw lengths, and slower speeds I feel that KE is not what matters the most, momentum is. Just talk to any traditional guy.
     
  9. Kennethp7

    Kennethp7 Newb

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Posts:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    When i use the KE charts found online and change my arrow weight the KE doesn't change that much. For example if i shot a 267 grain arrow at 252fps the KE is 51.72 if i shot a 347 grain arrow at 259fps the KE is 51.7. That doesn't seem like that big of a difference to me. Again i am new so maybe the calculations are wrong, but i checked on three different websites. My question is, if these calculations are right why not shot the faster arrow if i am not going to lose even one pound of KE energy?
     
  10. OHbowhntr

    OHbowhntr Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Posts:
    2,443
    Likes Received:
    21
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SE Ohio
    Try something more ACCURATE.... try this link....

    http://utopiaprogramming.com/ke/KineticEnergy.html#

    A 267 gr arrow at 252 fps is gonna net about 37.7ft/#'s , whereas a 347 @ 259 is gonna get you about 51.7ft/#'s, not sure where you got you're numbers, but the link I provided will also estimate arrow speed, it's pretty close to real world numbers as well...:tu:
     
    Last edited: May 26, 2010
  11. davydtune

    davydtune Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Posts:
    267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Albion PA
  12. Backcountry

    Backcountry Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Posts:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bitteroot Valley
    To an extent KE doesn't mean much to you. The easiest way I can describe it, which is far fetched, is this.

    What would hurt worse getting hit by? a baseball at 90mph or a 10# bowling ball at 40mph?
     
  13. Kennethp7

    Kennethp7 Newb

    Joined:
    May 21, 2010
    Posts:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    sorry for the mix up but i meant 367 not 267.
     
  14. davydtune

    davydtune Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Posts:
    267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Albion PA
    An old timer put it to me this way many years ago: "What's harder to stop? A yugo or a semi?"
     
  15. 05_sprcrw

    05_sprcrw Newb

    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Posts:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Lincoln, NE
    I always go heavier, for the simple fact that they are quieter, have more momentum, and since they absorb more of the energy from the bow you don't get hand shock or that jump forward people complain about.
     
  16. OHbowhntr

    OHbowhntr Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Posts:
    2,443
    Likes Received:
    21
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    SE Ohio
    Couldn't have been that OLD if it was after the Yugo era..... :poke: :D
     
  17. racewayking

    racewayking Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Northern Illinois
    There is no reason you can't drop the arrow weight down to 367. I shoot 403gr out of my Katera set at 84# and have put an arrow through the spine with a pass through.

    Make sure your setup has the KE and don't worry so much about having a heavy arrow. Speed has advantages such as flatter trajectory, so find the combo you want as long as you have the KE to take your game ethically.
     
  18. davydtune

    davydtune Weekend Warrior

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Posts:
    267
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Albion PA
    Well that was back when the Yugos came out so maybe that makes me an old timer. :o
     
  19. Backcountry

    Backcountry Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2009
    Posts:
    4,265
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bitteroot Valley
    This is somewhat true, yeah 367gr will kill a deer, with a well placed shot. First time he hits in the shoulder though it's bye bye deer
     
  20. racewayking

    racewayking Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    5,039
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Northern Illinois
    And a slower moving heavier arrow is going to get more penetration into a shoulder bone and kill the deer?????
     

Share This Page