Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Beef vs Venision vs Fish

Discussion in 'The Water Cooler' started by BJE80, Jul 22, 2014.

?

Which one do you prefer?

  1. Fish

    7 vote(s)
    15.2%
  2. Venision

    16 vote(s)
    34.8%
  3. Beef

    23 vote(s)
    50.0%
  1. Dan

    Dan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Wisconsin
    Boiled Northern (pike) dipped in garlic butter is awesome. Most guys don't like it because the skin is slimy and they don't know how to get the Y bones out properly.
     
  2. Skywalker

    Skywalker Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2010
    Posts:
    6,850
    Likes Received:
    806
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Missouri
    I agree with this. For me, northern ranks way higher than Walleye.
     
  3. John Galt

    John Galt Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Posts:
    1,417
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Un like beef, that gets better when aged, a fish gets no better than it is when caught, a shore lunch with morning caught walleyes is hard to beat!
     
  4. Matt

    Matt Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2011
    Posts:
    7,115
    Likes Received:
    181
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NC/GA
    For me its...
    Beef
    Chicken
    Fish
    Venison

    On the fish topic...Blackened salmon with garlic butter.
     
  5. OHbowhunter

    OHbowhunter Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Posts:
    1,939
    Likes Received:
    360
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ohio
    beef
    fish
    venison
     
  6. Lester

    Lester Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Posts:
    8,599
    Likes Received:
    3,232
    Dislikes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Buffalo Minnesota
    Brad you didnt list the best choice.

    1. Seafood
    2. Venison back straps
    3. Beef porterhouse
    4. Fish and I like fish but I wouldn't choose it over those options
     
  7. Dan

    Dan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Wisconsin
    Lets not get carried away now.
     
  8. Skywalker

    Skywalker Grizzled Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2010
    Posts:
    6,850
    Likes Received:
    806
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Missouri
    I've never really cared for Walleye. Best freshwater fish I've ever had was spoonbill.
     
  9. Siman/OH

    Siman/OH Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Posts:
    16,722
    Likes Received:
    1,974
    Dislikes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Ohio
    A good beef steak #1, then Venison, then fish.
     
  10. tynimiller

    tynimiller Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Posts:
    13,051
    Likes Received:
    4,852
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    Amen! We also introduced some people about the back fillet on a pike that a lot of people never even get...lotta meat left there.
     
  11. Dan

    Dan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Wisconsin
    Back meat? The 3 fillet method? That's not proper. Fillet it like a regular fish and then take the Y bones out.

    Here's a decent video showing how to do it.

    [video=youtube_share;LJYc1loAfU0]http://youtu.be/LJYc1loAfU0[/video]
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2014
  12. tynimiller

    tynimiller Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Posts:
    13,051
    Likes Received:
    4,852
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    I'll agree to disagree...we fillet it like a normal two fillet than remove the small back fillet as we call it...I do love some fresh pike though. Man reminds me of all the Canada fishing trips.
     
  13. Dan

    Dan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Wisconsin
    What back fillet are you talking about? If you cleaned it in the normal two fillet fashion, there isn't any meat left on the carcass. None.
     
  14. tynimiller

    tynimiller Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Posts:
    13,051
    Likes Received:
    4,852
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    You know now thinking about it I believe we'd always do the back one first which means you're right and I wonder why I was taught that way now. It's been awhile sadly since I've fish for pike with keeping to eat the plan...but yeah you wouldn't have anything left for the back part....must have been a thing my grandpa always did and told us on our trips. Well now it is gonna change next time :)
     
  15. Dan

    Dan Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Posts:
    7,307
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Location:
    NW Wisconsin
    Thats what I thought. You had me crazy confused there. Thought I was missing something all those years living in Ontario cleaning pike. :lol:
     
  16. tynimiller

    tynimiller Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Posts:
    13,051
    Likes Received:
    4,852
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    Yeah I think it probably came from gramps just avoiding the y bones so he would take the back meat and fillet around the bones...leaving more meat on the bad boy I would guess but that would be my guess.
     
  17. tynimiller

    tynimiller Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    Posts:
    13,051
    Likes Received:
    4,852
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    yeah dan this is the kind I was taught:



    Starts at 4:35 (your technique is the first one)....only difference is depending on size of the northern we may or may not have take the back two small fillets towards tail (these end up looking alot like bluegill fillets in the pan). 5 fillet technique really.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 15, 2017
  18. John Galt

    John Galt Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Posts:
    1,417
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Fish is a lot like deer, in being the quality of care in cleaning and cooking make all of the difference in taste and texture.
    Getting the hide off a deer as soon as possible and chilling the meat is the first rule for fine dining, just and so is it that ice and proper cleaning makes the days catch some thing to remember.

    Those of you that think eating a pen raised cow is better than a fresh fish or a nice back strap are doing some thing wrong in your preparation.
     
  19. BJE80

    BJE80 Legendary Woodsman

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Posts:
    14,268
    Likes Received:
    279
    Dislikes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Central and Northern Wisconsin
    I find it hard to find wild cows to kill. Therefore perhaps the animal is just superior tasting (to us) than the wild ones available. It doesn’t mean handling is an issue. Apples to oranges Mr. Galt.
     
  20. John Galt

    John Galt Die Hard Bowhunter

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Posts:
    1,417
    Likes Received:
    1
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    I never saw any one ride around with a steer in the back of their truck, gut shot with the hide on it 3 days after killing it either.

    The steak ain't been grilled that can hold a candle to fresh ice out crappies.
     

Share This Page