clearly.. We're still on the wrong point. I'm commenting on your removal of hunting privileges for picking up this shed antler. You stated they should be removed from said persons. I disagreed. Then pointed out out I think it's strange when a man has contradiction in his actions or opinion of actions. I have no idea why you keep bringing up trespasser.. I never mentioned it once until now.. But. You seem very adamant that you're against it. Great. Move on. That must be a conversation you're having in your head. No soapbox here. Just find it odd you're so swift to take away a mans privilege to hunt because he took an antler... When your company endorses hunters who hunt in states that are not legal to bait in. I understand it's not your responsibility or your company's. I find it a strange.. Distorted view however. Since.. You'd have to be totally naive to believe these hunters who hunt in states where your product is illegal.. Don't use them. Or.. Your company is totally full of crap and the hunters who endorse your products in states where it's illegal don't use them at all.. Your call I guess. Which is it? You understand the confusion.. Right?