Muzzy Broadheads

you said and i quote yet again "I am positive that there is no other head responsible for more lost and wounded game in the history of bowhunting."

those are your words....correct....correct.....that's what i thought

 

Correct. And the statement is accurate.

And your spin on it is making you look foolish. Just stop before you dig any deeper.

 

so my statement that a wounded animal has nothing to do with the head or the advertising that the head has behind it is foolish.....hmmm or it's just true....whichever

 

Anyone else want to take this slam dunk? Please....

 

shot one of my 3 bow kills last fall with a muzzy 3 blade 100gr. Did its job..

 

i would because the fact that the rages wound the deer and we lose them is because of the mechanical failure with the blades, and yes muzzy can wound a deer but if a muzzy had hit for a heart shot and a rage hit the same spot the muzzy would 9 out of 10 times kill it because a muzzy is a fixed blade not an expandable which is the rages downfall

 

Orrrr because "expand your killzone" means take bad shots and they will still die...

 

boe a good shot with a rage still wont kill the son of a *****

 

boe a good shot with a rage still wont kill the son of a *****

 

but now muzzys mx-3 are what i swear by no better

 

Rage and muzzy are one in the same now fellas! You guys are killing for the same team, really

 

nap kill zones qad exodus or g5 strikers

 

ya but with rages you wont be killin ****