you said and i quote yet again "I am positive that there is no other head responsible for more lost and wounded game in the history of bowhunting." those are your words....correct....correct.....that's what i thought
Correct. And the statement is accurate. And your spin on it is making you look foolish. Just stop before you dig any deeper.
so my statement that a wounded animal has nothing to do with the head or the advertising that the head has behind it is foolish.....hmmm or it's just true....whichever
i would because the fact that the rages wound the deer and we lose them is because of the mechanical failure with the blades, and yes muzzy can wound a deer but if a muzzy had hit for a heart shot and a rage hit the same spot the muzzy would 9 out of 10 times kill it because a muzzy is a fixed blade not an expandable which is the rages downfall